HomeoldMassachusetts city’s anti-pregnancy center ordinance fails

Massachusetts city’s anti-pregnancy center ordinance fails

Published on

A proposed ordinance to disparage and penalize pregnancy resource centers (PRCs) in the city of Easthampton, Massachusetts, has died. The City Council failed to secure enough votes on August 2 to overturn the mayor’s July veto of the ordinance.

The ordinance aimed to silence the so-called “deceptive advertising” by PRCs, which do not offer or refer women for abortions. According to the New Boston Post, the ordinance would have also had the city “endorse” abortion, would have the city “notify the public” about ways residents could file a consumer complaint against a PRC, and would have prohibited city employees from providing information about people involved with abortion to out-of-state officials.

The city currently has one PRC, Bethlehem House, which was vandalized last year.

On July 5, City Council members voted 6-1 to approve the ordinance, but it was vetoed the next day by Mayor Nicole LaChapelle. Though LaChapelle is pro-abortion, she feared the ordinance’s passage would cause the city to be subject to costly litigation. Although it initially appeared the council would have the necessary six votes needed to override LaChapelle’s veto, one council member changed his mind and the resulting 5-3 vote means that the ordinance has died.

Easthampton is not the first Massachusetts city that has pushed hard for an ordinance limiting PRCs only for the ordinance to fail in the end. A recent Worcester ordinance that would compel that city’s PRCs to discuss abortion options was dropped after city leaders realized it was unenforceable.

Though Governor Maura Healy issued a “warning” against PRCs when she was attorney general last year, it appears she was also responsible for warning against the passage of such ordinances on the basis that they would likely result in litigation.

The Catholic Action League of Massachusetts hailed the ordinance’s ultimate demise as “a victory for the First Amendment rights of crisis pregnancy centers, whose faith based ministries offer women compassionate alternatives to abortion.”

“This entire movement to target, demonize and restrict crisis pregnancy centers using contrived and unfounded claims of deception has its origins in an abortion industry, which has a compelling financial interest in suppressing its opposition,” said Catholic Action League Executive Director C. J. Doyle.

Editor’s note. This appeared at Live Action News and reposted with permission.

Journalist

Daniel Miller is responsible for nearly all of National Right to Life News' political writing.

With the election of Donald Trump to the U.S. presidency, Daniel Miller developed a deep obsession with U.S. politics that has never let go of the political scientist. Whether it's the election of Joe Biden, the midterm elections in Congress, the abortion rights debate in the Supreme Court or the mudslinging in the primaries - Daniel Miller is happy to stay up late for you.

Daniel was born and raised in New York. After living in China, working for a news agency and another stint at a major news network, he now lives in Arizona with his two daughters.

Order Now!

spot_img

Latest articles

The EU’s plans for the abolition of the secrecy of digital letters

Surveillance of private chats without suspicion could soon become mandatory in the EU. This...

Lloyd’s: Government behind Nord Stream sabotage

About a month ago, Zug-based Nord Stream AG filed a lawsuit against its insurers....

More like this

Biden urges hostage deal

US President Biden has called on Qatar and Egypt to do everything possible to...

Trump trial: ex-president rushes from court to campaign trail

Update, 11:00 a.m.: In the U.S., experts are surprised that Judge Juan Merchan has...

Donald Trump Ignores Court Gag Order

Trump can't talk about those involved in the New York trial. The ex-president can,...